Suffix Processing

Post Reply
kzinda
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2001 6:18 am

Suffix Processing

Post by kzinda »

I am searching for concept variants of "sterilization" in my text. While it would appear to me from the morphene stripping routine described in the manaual that after stripping, the word form being matched in the text is "steriliz," Texis does not find the form "sterilized." Conversely, "sterilized" does not find "sterilization." Why is that? And yes, suffix processing is turned on.
User avatar
John
Site Admin
Posts: 2622
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2000 3:18 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Suffix Processing

Post by John »

What do you have minwordlen and defsuffrm set to? They will also effect how the word is stripped.
John Turnbull
Thunderstone Software
kzinda
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2001 6:18 am

Suffix Processing

Post by kzinda »

minwordlen is set at default, which I beleive is 5.
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Posts: 5519
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2000 6:56 pm

Suffix Processing

Post by mark »

With default suffixes sterilized strips to steril and sterilization strips to steriliz. You could add ization to the suffix list to correspond to to ized.
kzinda
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2001 6:18 am

Suffix Processing

Post by kzinda »

I still don't understand why if "sterilzation" is stripped to "Steriliz", why it doesn't recognize "sterilized". Doesn't Texis look for the pattern match (steriliz) and then check for appropriate suffixes?
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Posts: 5519
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2000 6:56 pm

Suffix Processing

Post by mark »

When it finds sterilized it strips it down, then compares to what it's looking for. Basically, it compares roots after all suffix removal.
kzinda
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2001 6:18 am

Suffix Processing

Post by kzinda »

SO what your saying is that when it finds sterilzed in the text, it strips the the word (steril)and compares it against the stripped word in the query (steriliz)?
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Posts: 5519
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2000 6:56 pm

Suffix Processing

Post by mark »

yes
Post Reply