Additional Fields XML namespace changed

User avatar
jason112
Site Admin
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:35 pm

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by jason112 »

Is the search result someplace public that we could see? Otherwise we'll need to open a ticket to see exactly what XML and XSL are being used to figure out what's going on.
dietric
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:57 am

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by dietric »

I just submitted a ticket.
User avatar
jason112
Site Admin
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:35 pm

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by jason112 »

dietric
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:57 am

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by dietric »

Jason,

when do you think the issue with the multiple dates might be resolved, or is there a workaround? We are anxious to update our scripts to resolve an unrelated issue, but won't be able to do so unless the dates are handled correctly.

Thanks
ds
User avatar
jason112
Site Admin
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:35 pm

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by jason112 »

As a workaround, you should be able to extract the date from the content of the page where it says

Publish date: Jul 16, 2008

In the Data From Field section, set REX Search to "Publish date: \P=!$+" (without the quotes) and From Field to "Text".
dietric
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:57 am

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by dietric »

Jason,
is there a solution for the problem related to the date being retrieved multiple times? The workaround that I implemented is creating other troubles now...
User avatar
jason112
Site Admin
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:35 pm

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by jason112 »

There currently isn't one yet; I'll step up the investigation of it to see if we can figure out what's going on with it.
dietric
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:57 am

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by dietric »

Is texisScripts 6.3.5 supposed to fix this? It looked like it would, but so far I have had no luck, the date is not parsed from the meta field...
User avatar
jason112
Site Admin
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:35 pm

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by jason112 »

Correct, it looks like meta values are not currently overriding HTTP values; these will get swapped in an update.
User avatar
jason112
Site Admin
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:35 pm

Additional Fields XML namespace changed

Post by jason112 »

Actually I take that back, I was looking at the wrong date in my test. It appears to be working here. When I request the URL

http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmed ... ail/497285

And store last-modified in a custom additional field,
it correctly gets 2006-11-15 00:00:00

Are you sure the page is being rewalked?
Post Reply