A question about replication architecture.
Today i have set up our 2 boxes as described below
Appliance 1 is indexing our private (Intranet) sites individually and replicates them locally in a global index
Appliance 2 is indexing our public (Internet) sites individually and replicates them locally in a global index, it also replicates them to the remote global index.
Appliance 2
profA ==> Internet (local)
==> AllSites (Appliance 1)
profB ==> Internet (local)
==> AllSites (Appliance 1)
...
Appliance 1
profAA ==> AllSites (local)
profBB ==> AllSites (local)
Q : Is this the best setup?
It seems to work, but what about the following alternate setup?
Appliance 2
profA ==> Internet (local)
profB ==> Internet (local)
...
Internet ==> AllSites (Appliance 1)
Appliance 1
profAA ==> AllSites (local)
profBB ==> AllSites (local)
Is that better or worse?
Today i have set up our 2 boxes as described below
Appliance 1 is indexing our private (Intranet) sites individually and replicates them locally in a global index
Appliance 2 is indexing our public (Internet) sites individually and replicates them locally in a global index, it also replicates them to the remote global index.
Appliance 2
profA ==> Internet (local)
==> AllSites (Appliance 1)
profB ==> Internet (local)
==> AllSites (Appliance 1)
...
Appliance 1
profAA ==> AllSites (local)
profBB ==> AllSites (local)
Q : Is this the best setup?
It seems to work, but what about the following alternate setup?
Appliance 2
profA ==> Internet (local)
profB ==> Internet (local)
...
Internet ==> AllSites (Appliance 1)
Appliance 1
profAA ==> AllSites (local)
profBB ==> AllSites (local)
Is that better or worse?